I'll admit to some disappointment with this essay on new writing tools by Paul Ford — Ford is a smart writer and the topic seems a good fit for him, but I don't think he gets as deeply as he could into the legitimacy of the claims made by the makers of some of these writing tools.
Ulysses is a unique text editor, which aims to give creative writers, novelists and storytellers the best writing experience available on any platform today. To achieve that, Ulysses includes an innovative 'tabbed' single-window interface, featuring integrated Notepads, a Document Browser, advanced Search&Replace capabilities and multi-document. Ulysses Organizes All Your Projects in One Place. Ulysses' unified library holds everything you'll ever write, and is equipped for managing writing projects of all sizes and ambitions. Be it love letters, simple notes, daily blog posts or the Great American Novel – with Ulysses, your writing is in the best of hands. Scrivener uses an RTF editor as it's input window, which is more comfortable for word processor refugees. Ulysses III, on the other hand, utilizes a customized version of Markdown syntax in it's editor. Given my love of plain-text writing, this appeals to me, but is Ulysses a better writing tool than Scrivener? Many text editors will help you out with Markdown. For example, Byword will continue bulleted/numbered lists automatically. (Ulysses III will do the same if you hit alt-enter.) If you are new to Markdown, start with the basics and the rest will come. Later, you can get fancier and include URL links, images, and more.
Ulysses Iii 1 2 – Creative Writing Text Editor Pdf
As far as I can tell, the tools that he examines either aren't really about writing at all — for instance, Ghost is an environment for publishing stuff online, stuff that you might write anywhere else — or they amount to taking already-familiar desktop writing tools and putting them online to make collaboration easier. That's about it.
Not an inconsiderable achievement, mind you. Consider Editorially: it takes a practice that some of us have been following for several years now — writing in a plain-text editor with Markdown syntax which you can convert later to HTML or .doc format — , situates it in a super-attractive editing environment, and encourages sharing your writing with collaborators or editors. If I wrote regularly that way, I'd love Editorially.
Fargo does much the same for outlining — though outlining doesn't seem naturally collaborative to me, so I'm not sure what the use-cases for Fargo are. But just as Editorially won't be new to you if you've been following plain-text gospel, Fargo won't be new to you if you've used, say, OmniOutliner or, if you're a real oldtimer, the greatly-lamented DOS-only GrandView. In short, even if the tools you make are really cool, you're not 'reinventing' writing just by coding them in HTML5 and putting them in the cloud.
But I do think that a handful of recent apps have indeed made some significant innovations in writing technology, and I'll talk about them in some near-future posts.
Text Patterns
Ulysses Iii 1 2 – Creative Writing Text Editors
Tags
